Safety, Accountability, and Funding Efficiency for
Transportation Act of 2003 (Introduced in House)
HR
1980
108th
CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1980
To require government agencies carrying out surface
transportation projects to conduct a cost-benefit analysis
before procuring architectural, engineering, and related
services from a private contractor, and for other purposes.
IN
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May
6, 2003
Ms.
KILPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in
addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period
to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the
jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A
BILL
To require government agencies carrying out surface
transportation projects to conduct a cost-benefit analysis
before procuring architectural, engineering, and related
services from a private contractor, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Safety, Accountability, and
Funding Efficiency for Transportation Act of 2003'.
SEC.
2. FINDINGS.
(1) to ensure that taxpayers receive safe, high quality
transportation services at the best possible price, a
government agency carrying out a surface transportation
project should conduct a cost-benefit analysis before
procuring architectural, engineering, and related services
from a private contractor; and
SEC.
3. DEFINITIONS.
In
this Act, the following definitions apply:
(1) ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, AND RELATED SERVICES- The
term `architectural, engineering, and related services'
means architectural, landscape architectural,
environmental, engineering, land surveying, construction
project management, and construction inspection services
and services related to permitting and environmental
studies, the preparation of plans, specifications, and
estimates, and the acquisition of rights-of-way.
(3) GOVERNMENT AGENCY- The term `government agency' means
a State, local, regional, interregional, or other
governmental entity that receives Federal funds to carry
out surface transportation projects.
(5) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT- The term `surface
transportation project' means a project eligible for
assistance under title 23, United States Code, a capital
project (as defined in section 5302 of title 49, United
States Code), and any other project related to surface
transportation that the Secretary determines appropriate.
SEC.
4. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS.
(a)
IN GENERAL- For fiscal year 2005 and each fiscal year
thereafter, Federal funds made available to carry out a
surface transportation project may be used by a government
agency to enter into a private contract of $100,000 or more
to procure architectural, engineering, and related services
only if the government agency conducts a cost-benefit
analysis for the private contract in accordance with the
requirements of this section.
(b)
COMPONENTS- A cost-benefit analysis conducted by a
government agency for a private contract under subsection
(a) shall contain, at a minimum, the following:
(2) An estimate of the cost of procuring the services
under the private contract, including the price of the
contract, the cost to the government agency of negotiating
and awarding the contract, and the cost to the government
agency of inspecting, supervising, monitoring, and
overseeing the contract.
(3) An estimate of the cost of having the services
performed by the government agency (or a government agency
assisting such agency), including staff salaries and
benefits, office facilities and space, equipment and
materials, and other costs that can be reasonably
attributed to the performance of the services and that
would not be otherwise be incurred by the government
agency.
SEC.
5. MATERIALS TO ACCOMPANY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS.
(a)
IN GENERAL- If, after conducting a cost-benefit analysis for
a private contract under section 4, a government agency
finds that the benefits of entering into the contract
outweigh the costs, the agency shall also prepare for the
contract the materials required by this section.
(b)
PERFORMANCE HISTORY- The materials to be prepared under
subsection (a) shall include a performance history of the
private contractor. Such history shall include, at a
minimum, the following:
(1) A description of any work performed for the government
agency by the private contractor in the preceding 5-year
period or, if such work was not performed, a description
of any work performed for other government agencies by the
private contractor in such 5-year period.
(4) Any citations, court findings, or administrative
findings against the private contractor for a violation of
applicable Federal, State, and local laws, including laws
governing environmental protection, employee safety and
health, labor relations, and other employment
requirements.
(5) Documentation to substantiate that the qualifications,
experience, and expertise of the employees to be utilized
by the private contractor under the private contract,
including subcontractors, are at least equal to that of
the government agency employees who could be providing the
services.
(c)
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION HISTORY- The materials to be prepared
under subsection (a) shall include a political contribution
history of the private contractor. Such history shall
include, at a minimum, a listing of all contributions made
by the private contractor to political parties and
candidates for political office in the preceding 5-year
period.
(d)
CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE BOND- The materials to be
prepared under subsection (a) shall include a certification
by the government agency that the agency will receive from
the private contractor a performance bond or similar
instrument that ensures the performance of the contractor
under the private contract.
SEC.
6. DISCLOSURE OF RESULTS OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS.
If,
after conducting a cost-benefit analysis for a private
contract under section 4 and preparing the accompanying
materials under section 5, a government agency finds that it
is in the public interest to enter into the contract, the
agency shall, at least 30 days before entering into the
contract--
SEC.
7. COMMENTS.
In
the 15-day period following the date of publication by a
government agency of the results of a cost-benefit analysis
for a private contract under section 4--
SEC.
8. USE OF QUALIFICATION-BASED SELECTION CRITERIA.
In
procuring architectural, engineering, and related services
from private sources using Federal funds as part of a
surface transportation project, a government agency shall
use the procedures for procuring architectural and
engineering services under chapter 11 of title 40, united
States Code, or equivalent State qualifications-based
requirements.
SEC.
9. SPECIALTY, EMERGENCY, TEMPORARY WORK.
Upon the request of a government agency, the Secretary may
waive the application of this Act with respect to a private
contract if the Secretary determines that the government
agency cannot perform the work to be conducted under the
contract with existing or additional government employees
because the work is of an emergency, specialty, or
intermittent nature and would likely cause regular periods
of underutilization of government employees.
About NASHTU
|Press Room
|
Membership
| Links
of Importance
|
2005
Conference
Conference
Archives
|
Legislation
| Bill Summary
|
Committee Testimony
Member
Reports
| NASHTU Supports TRAC |
Contact
NASHTU
Copyright ©2007
NASHTU.
All rights reserved. |